![]() I have a Fuji it8 target that seems to fill that range, so I can color-calibrate it to that. For positive (slides) I just scan with the gain equal and at 1.0. So, Dimage ‘scan as positive’ (and I tweak the R, G and B gain to let the filmstrip of C41 be aligned and quite high, but quite some safe margin to clipping). ![]() I think it does something wrong in this, because when I tweak - painfully by trail and error - the focus number in Vuefast I manage to get it just as sharp as Dimage and Silverfast… but Vuescan’s autofocus just doesn’t pinpoint that number (while the other two work fine!!). If you pick a spot to autofocus, it does it’s thing, but way faster than way Dimage and Silverfast are able to do. And no, I’m not scanning silver-based negs or Kodachrome. Maybe my IR channel is different to what Silverfast expects, but I get weird lineskips and blotches, areas where the iSRD goes nuts while nothing was there. And it creates artifacts (never had issues with my previous scanner with it). ![]() ![]() Silverfast8 doesn’t use Digital Ice, but their own IR-assisted iSRD. … I discovered that - for my Scanelite Mark1 at least - the only programs managing to get a good scan are dimage and Silverfast6. After drying dimage (in a VM on Windows XP 32 bit), Silverfast 6 (in a VM on Windows XP 32 bit), Silverfast 8 (good in modern OS) or Vuesca (good in modern OS)… ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |